Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs Robertson

Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on LinkedIn0Tweet about this on Twitter2share on TumblrShare on Reddit0Digg thisShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Facebook0
SPONSORED ADS

Political Law – Sovereignty

Frank and James Robertson (brothers) were American citizens born in the Philippines. They stayed here in the Philippines until they were repatriated by the US in 1945. Thereafter they established their domicile in California. Soon after they were employed by the US Federal Government as workers in the US Navy. They were later assigned at the US Naval Base in Olongapo City in 1962. They hold American passports and are admitted as special temporary visitors under the Philippine Immigration Act of 1940. On the other hand, the Commissioner contends that the respondents are subject to taxation because their residence here in the Philippines is not by reason of their employment in connection with the construction, maintenance, operation or defense of the US Bases here as provided by the MBA. The CIR claims that the respondents have properties here in the Philippines and that James Robertson is even a retiree and is currently living in Olongapo City with his family. Furthermore, the burden of proof of such exemption to taxation shall be upon the respondents.

ISSUE: Whether or not Respondents are exempt from taxation?

HELD: The law and the facts of the case are so clear that there is no room left for doubt the validity of private respondents’ defense. In order to avail oneself of the tax exemption under the RP-US Military Bases Agreement: he must be a national of the United States employed in connection with the construction, maintenance, operation or defense, of the bases, residing in the Philippines by reason of such employment, and the income derived is from the U.S. Government (Art. XII par. 2 of PI-US Military Bases Agreement of 1947). Said circumstances are all present in the case at bar.

 

Read full text here.

SPONSORED ADS