<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Uber Digests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uberdigests.info/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uberdigests.info</link>
	<description>Case Digests for Law Students</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:32:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What is the Miranda Doctrine?</title>
		<link>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/05/what-is-the-miranda-doctrine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/05/what-is-the-miranda-doctrine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 14:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uberchan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remedial Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filipino tagalog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal arrest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miranda doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miranda warning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philippines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remedial law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warrant of arrest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberdigests.info/?p=10671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Miranda Doctrine or the Miranda Warning provides that:</p> <p>1. A person in custody must be informed at the outset in clear and unequivocal terms that he has the right to remain silent and that anything he says can and will be used against him in a court of law;</p> <p>2. He or she has ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/05/what-is-the-miranda-doctrine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Best Jobs To Have While Taking Up Law</title>
		<link>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/the-best-jobs-to-have-while-taking-up-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/the-best-jobs-to-have-while-taking-up-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 23:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uberchan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law School Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law school life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law student]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Best Jobs To Have While Taking Up Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working students]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberdigests.info/?p=10614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.uberdigests.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/lawyermcdo.jpg"></a>Law school requires a hell lot of time and effort. As much as possible, once enrolled, one should devote all his or her time in studying law. But not all of us were blessed enough to have folks who can afford to send us to law school. I am studying in a law school ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/the-best-jobs-to-have-while-taking-up-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BAR MATTER: BENJAMIN DACANAY</title>
		<link>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/bar-matter-benjamin-dacanay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/bar-matter-benjamin-dacanay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uberchan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SCRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[540 SCRA 424]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B.M. No. 1678]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bar Matter: Benjamin Dacanay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bar Matter: Dacanay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[full text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In Re: Benjamin Dacanay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In Re: Dacanay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nationality Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petition for Leave to Reclaim Practice of Law of Benjamin Dacanay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practice of Law is Reserved for Filipinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberdigests.info/?p=10579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;" align="center"><a title="Bar Matter: Benjamin Dacanay Case Digest" href="http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/petition-for-leave-to-reclaim-practice-of-law-of-benjamin-dacanay/">READ CASE DIGEST HERE</a>.</p> <p style="text-align: center;" align="center">Republic of the Philippines<br /> SUPREME COURT<br /> Manila</p> <p style="text-align: center;" align="center">EN BANC</p> <p>B.M. No. 1678             December 17, 2007</p> <p>PETITION FOR LEAVE TO RESUME PRACTICE OF LAW,<br /> BENJAMIN M. DACANAY, petitioner.</p> ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/bar-matter-benjamin-dacanay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Petition for Leave to Reclaim Practice of Law of Benjamin Dacanay</title>
		<link>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/petition-for-leave-to-reclaim-practice-of-law-of-benjamin-dacanay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/petition-for-leave-to-reclaim-practice-of-law-of-benjamin-dacanay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uberchan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[540 SCRA 424]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B.M. No. 1678]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bar Matter: Benjamin Dacanay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bar Matter: Dacanay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In Re: Benjamin Dacanay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In Re: Dacanay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nationality Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petition for Leave to Reclaim Practice of Law of Benjamin Dacanay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practice of Law is Reserved for Filipinos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberdigests.info/?p=10577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;" align="center">540 SCRA 424 – Civil Law – Private International Law – Nationality Theory – Practice of Law is Reserved for Filipinos </p> <p>In 1998, Atty. Benjamin Dacanay went to Canada to seek medical help. In order for him to take advantage of Canada’s free medical aid program he became a Canadian citizen in ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/petition-for-leave-to-reclaim-practice-of-law-of-benjamin-dacanay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AVELINO vs COURT OF APPEALS</title>
		<link>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/avelino-vs-court-of-appeals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/avelino-vs-court-of-appeals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 20:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uberchan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SCRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avelino vs CA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avelino vs Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[full text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G.R. No. 115181]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Partition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Letters of Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maria Socorro Avelino vs CA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maria Socorro Avelino vs Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remedial law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Succession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberdigests.info/?p=10534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;" align="center"><a title="Avelino vs Court of Appeals Case Digest" href="http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/maria-socorro-avelino-vs-court-of-appeals/">READ CASE DIGEST HERE</a>.</p> <p style="text-align: center;" align="center">Republic of the Philippines<br /> SUPREME COURT<br /> Manila</p> <p style="text-align: center;" align="center">SECOND DIVISION</p> <p>G.R. No. 115181             March 31, 2000</p> <p>MARIA SOCORRO AVELINO, petitioner, <br /> vs.<br /> COURT OF APPEALS, ANGELINA AVELINO, ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/avelino-vs-court-of-appeals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maria Socorro Avelino vs Court of Appeals</title>
		<link>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/maria-socorro-avelino-vs-court-of-appeals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/maria-socorro-avelino-vs-court-of-appeals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 20:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uberchan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remedial Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Succession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avelino vs CA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avelino vs Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G.R. No. 115181]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Partition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Letters of Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maria Socorro Avelino vs CA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maria Socorro Avelino vs Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remedial law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberdigests.info/?p=10532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;" align="center">Remedial Law – Special Proceedings – Letters of Administration – Judicial Partition</p> <p>In 1989, Antonio Avelino, Sr. died intestate. In 1991, his daughter, Maria Socorro Avelino filed a petition for the issuance of letters of administration of the estate of his deceased father. All the other heirs however opposed the petition and ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/maria-socorro-avelino-vs-court-of-appeals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sample Articles of Incorporation (with by laws): Non Stock Corporation</title>
		<link>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/sample-articles-of-incorporation-with-by-laws-non-stock-corporation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/sample-articles-of-incorporation-with-by-laws-non-stock-corporation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 08:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uberchan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aoi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles of incorporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non stock corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sample]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberdigests.info/?p=10522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;" align="center">Articles of Incorporation<br /> of the</p> <p style="text-align: center;" align="center">Baguio City Overseas Workers Foundation, Inc.</p> <p>KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:</p> <p>That we, all of whom are of legal age and residents of the Philippines, have this day voluntarily associated ourselves for the purpose of organizing the Foundation, a non-stock and non­-profit ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/sample-articles-of-incorporation-with-by-laws-non-stock-corporation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MACALINTAL vs COMELEC</title>
		<link>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/macalintal-vs-comelec/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/macalintal-vs-comelec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 06:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uberchan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SCRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Absentee Voters Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[absentee voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[full text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G.R. No. 157013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macalintal vs comelec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macalintal vs commission on elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proclamation of Winners in a National Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romulo Macalintal vs Commission on Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suffrage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberdigests.info/?p=10509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;" align="center"><a title="Macalintal vs COMELEC Case Digest" href="http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/romulo-macalintal-vs-commission-on-elections/">READ CASE DIGEST HERE</a>.</p> <p style="text-align: center;" align="center">Republic of the Philippines<br /> SUPREME COURT<br /> Manila</p> <p style="text-align: center;" align="center">EN BANC</p> <p>G.R. No. 157013            July 10, 2003</p> <p>ATTY. ROMULO B. MACALINTAL, petitioner,</p> <p>vs.</p> <p>COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, HON. ALBERTO ROMULO, in his official ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/macalintal-vs-comelec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romulo Macalintal vs Commission on Elections</title>
		<link>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/romulo-macalintal-vs-commission-on-elections/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/romulo-macalintal-vs-commission-on-elections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 05:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uberchan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Absentee Voters Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[absentee voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G.R. No. 157013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macalintal vs comelec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macalintal vs commission on elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proclamation of Winners in a National Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romulo Macalintal vs Commission on Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suffrage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberdigests.info/?p=10506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;" align="center">Political Law – Election Laws – Absentee Voters Act – Proclamation of Winners in a National Elections</p> <p>Romulo Macalintal, as a lawyer and a taxpayer, questions the validity of the Overseas Absentee Voting Act of 2003 (R.A. 9189). He questions the validity of the said act on the following grounds, among others:</p> ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/romulo-macalintal-vs-commission-on-elections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 Bar Exam Results</title>
		<link>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/2012-bar-exam-results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/2012-bar-exam-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 04:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uberchan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 Bar Exam Results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 bar exams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar exam results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar passers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberdigests.info/?p=10502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>TOP TEN</p> <p>1. INGLES, Ignatius Michael D., Ateneo de Manila University, 85.640%<br /> 2. KING KAY, Catherine Beatrice O., Ateneo de Manila University, 84.720%<br /> 3. LACSON, April Carmela B., University of the Philippines, 84.480%<br /> 4. ROMUALDO, Xavier Jesus D., Ateneo de Manila University, 84.100%<br /> 5. BASE, Maria Graciela D., University of the ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/2012-bar-exam-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is a nuisance candidate?</title>
		<link>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/who-is-a-nuisance-candidate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/who-is-a-nuisance-candidate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 06:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uberchan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuisance candidate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Who is a nuisance candidate?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberdigests.info/?p=10473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A nuisance candidate is defined as follows:</p> <p style="padding-left: 30px;">1. One who files his candidacy to put the election process in mockery or disrepute<br /> 2. One who causes confusion amont the voters by the similarity of the names of the registered candidates<br /> 3. one who, based on demonstrable circumstances or acts, has no ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/who-is-a-nuisance-candidate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PEÑA vs COURT OF APPEALS</title>
		<link>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/pena-vs-court-of-appeals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/pena-vs-court-of-appeals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 07:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uberchan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SCRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[193 SCRA 717]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board Meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board resolutions may be questioned by third persons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corpo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporation code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporation Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[full text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G.R. No. 91478]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercantile law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peña vs CA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peña vs Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosita Peña vs CA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosita Peña vs Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sale of Corporate Properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockholders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberdigests.info/?p=10466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;" align="center"><a title="Peña vs Court of Appeals Case Digest" href="http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/rosita-pena-vs-court-of-appeals/">READ CASE DIGEST HERE</a>.</p> <p style="text-align: center;" align="center">Republic of the Philippines<br /> SUPREME COURT<br /> Manila</p> <p style="text-align: center;" align="center">FIRST DIVISION</p> <p align="center"> <p>G.R. No. 91478           February 7, 1991</p> <p>ROSITA PEÑA petitioner,</p> <p>vs.</p> <p>THE COURT OF APPEALS, SPOUSES RISING T. YAP and CATALINA YAP, PAMPANGA ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/pena-vs-court-of-appeals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rosita Peña vs Court of Appeals</title>
		<link>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/rosita-pena-vs-court-of-appeals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/rosita-pena-vs-court-of-appeals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 07:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uberchan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporation Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercantile Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[193 SCRA 717]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board Meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board resolutions may be questioned by third persons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corpo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporation code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporation Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G.R. No. 91478]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercantile law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peña vs CA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peña vs Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosita Peña vs CA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosita Peña vs Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sale of Corporate Properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockholders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberdigests.info/?p=10464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;" align="center">193 SCRA 717 – Business Organization – Corporation Law – Board resolutions may be questioned by third persons – Board Meetings – Quorum – Sale of Corporate Properties</p> <p>In 1962, the Pampanga Bus Company (PAMBUSCO) took out a loan from the Development Bank of the Philippines (DBP). PAMBUSCO used the parcels of ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/rosita-pena-vs-court-of-appeals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SAN FERNANDO vs STA. ROMANA</title>
		<link>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/san-fernando-vs-sta-romana/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/san-fernando-vs-sta-romana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uberchan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SCRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[full text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G.R. No. L-30159]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipality of San Fernando La Union vs Timoteo Sta. Romana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Fernando vs Sta. Romana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sand and Gravel Fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes Levied By a Province]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberdigests.info/?p=10459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;" align="center"><a title="San Fernando vs Sta. Romana Case Digest" href="http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/municipality-of-san-fernando-la-union-vs-timoteo-sta-romana/">READ CASE DIGEST HERE</a>.</p> <p style="text-align: center;" align="center">Republic of the Philippines<br /> SUPREME COURT<br /> Manila</p> <p style="text-align: center;" align="center">SECOND DIVISION</p> <p>G.R. No. L-30159            March 31, 1987</p> <p>MUNICIPALITY OF SAN FERNANDO, LA UNION represented by Mayor LORENZO L. DACANAY, plaintiff-appellee, (respondent)</p> <p>vs.</p> <p>MAYOR TIMOTEO STA. ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/san-fernando-vs-sta-romana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Municipality of San Fernando, La Union vs Timoteo Sta. Romana</title>
		<link>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/municipality-of-san-fernando-la-union-vs-timoteo-sta-romana/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/municipality-of-san-fernando-la-union-vs-timoteo-sta-romana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Uberchan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G.R. No. L-30159]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipality of San Fernando La Union vs Timoteo Sta. Romana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Fernando vs Sta. Romana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sand and Gravel Fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes Levied By a Province]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberdigests.info/?p=10457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;" align="center">Taxation – Local Taxation – Taxes Levied By a Province – Sand and Gravel Fee</p> <p>In 1968, the Municipality of San Fernando, La Union undertook road constructions. It sent its trucks to the nearby Municipality of Luna, La Union to gather sand and gravel. But then the agents of the Luna, La ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uberdigests.info/2013/03/municipality-of-san-fernando-la-union-vs-timoteo-sta-romana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->